1way2God.net - This page last updated 13 January 2005. Copyright © 1way2God.net 2002-2004.

You are at: 1way2God.net   >  Christian Resources   >  New Testament   >  Revelation > Printer-Friendly Version

Revelation

The Revelation of John online

     Content of this Study  (top)

     Author  (top)

It is said that no NT book has a stronger or earlier tradition about its authorship than the Revelation of John (Carson/Moo/Morris, p.468) - and not without good reason: Justin, Melito (bishop of Sardis), Irenaeus and the Muratorian canon, all from the early and mid-2nd Century ascribe Revelation to the Apostle John. There is also evidence that Papias, a man who personally knew John the Apostle attributed it to him as well (see C/M/M, p.468). In fact, there is no evidence that anyone doubted this claim until Dionysius, a 3rd Century bishop of Alexandria.

Dionysius and almost all who share his doubt, base their concerns on the content of the text, arguing that 1) if John the Apostle were the author he would have mentioned his apostolic standing somewhere in the letter; 2) the author of Revelation could not be the same as the author of the fourth gospel or the first epistle of John, due to a) theological and b) stylistic differences between the texts.

In answer to the first, it is often pointed out that there is little reason for the author, if John the Apostle, to mention his apostolicity: he was well-known to his intended audience already, and there doesn't appear to be any other likely well-known "John"s in that part of the church at the time from which he has to distinguish himself (C/M/M p.472). Guthrie also asks, "Was the Asiatic church overrun by brilliant Christians by the name of John, who would only need to announce their name for the Christians to know which was meant?" (Guthrie p.946).

In answer to the second, the theology of Revelation does differ in focus from that of the Fourth Gospel certainly, as does the style; however, these both are adequately accounted for when the purpose of each is taken into account: while the Gospel was written as a record of the life of Christ, the Revelation is a complex letter to churches, first calling them into account and encouraging them, then moving into a record of a vision of the times to come and the coming of "The New Jerusalem" - a difference in focus of theology, and a difference in style would be expected I should think!

It seems foolhardy to neglect the early church witness to the authorship of Revelation by John the Apostle. There is no strong case against this claim, even though many contemporary scholars are persuaded by the case that exists. For a full discussion on the authorship of John, see Guthrie, New Testament Introduction, pp.932 ff. and C/M/M, An Introduction to the New Testament, pp.468-473.

     Date  (top)

There is a very large time-frame in which it is possible to date Revelation (approx. early 50's to early 2nd Century). It seems most likely, however, that it was written during the reign of the Roman Emperor Domitian (81-96 AD), most likely in the final years of his reign.

     Content  (top)

     Reading Revelation  (top)

Most who have any acquaintance with the Revelation of John view its contents as somewhat incomprehensible - having too much symbolism and hidden meanings to be applicable, or even understandable today. For this reason study of Revelation will often be shied away from by the modern reader. This is a shame, as Revelation can be an amazingly rewarding book to read if approached in the right way: much of the customs, symbolisms, allusions and history, which the original readers would have understood a great deal easier than we, is lost on the modern reader; however, understanding can be gained through an appreciation of the extent to which this prophecy should be interpreted, the layout of the text, and certain meanings and symbolisms.

The extent of necessary interpretation  (top)

Some students of Revelation will demand an absolutely literal interpretation of the events described in Revelation. (In fact, a great deal of sites on the Internet are dedicated to end-time prophecy based on this kind of literal interpretation.) Examples of the results of this type of approach can be found in groups or individuals who believe they know the date and time of the return of Christ (but cf. Matt. 24:36), or those who attempt to predict major world events or catastrophes.

Others claim that John was writing of events immediately following or pertaining to his time. It is indeed easy to see a Roman Emperor persecuting Christians as "the beast" (chapter 13), and it is similarly easy to tie in other events that occurred in the immediate post-history of John with events described in His revelation.

However, we must ascertain that John's text had immediate relevance to those of his time, as well as continued relevance to readers throughout history. While it may have been necessary for John to use symbols (which were readily understandable to the immediate recipients) in order to mask his pro-Christian (and somewhat anti-Roman) message, the use of symbols also indicates the possibility that John was referring to events right throughout world history - perhaps even one symbolic reference of John refers to multiple events of a similar type.

Discussion on the extent of necessary interpretation remains undecided (although I am persuaded that a completely literal interpretation is out of the question!). It seems, however, that the importance of John's message is not in conveying or predicting the events of the future (be it immediate or continuing future) as many assume it to be. Rather it is important how events and beings of a certain nature interact with mankind, God and Christ, how they work according to the will of God, and where they fit in, in the playing out of world history. For example, it seems that it is not so important who 'the beast' is, as the fact that he misleads the inhabitants of the earth to turn away from God and as a result will be dealt with according to God's will. From this we should learn to watch for, and be wary of, those who would turn our attention from God towards a false god. Similarly, John recorded Christ's promise to return not so that we could try and establish the exact time He will return, but so that we can live expecting His return at any time, and so be prepared for it.

Therefore, in this study I will not focus on "who" or "what" specifically is represented by some of the more ambiguous symbols, but the meaning behind them and the application to us today. Below (under the heading "Symbols and meanings") are listed some of the more obvious meanings of the symbolic language of John.

Layout  (top)

Reading Revelation closely, we see that John had two visions incorporated into the text, the first beginning in Chapter 1 and the second in Chapter 4. All content in Chapters 2-3 relate to the first vision, and all content in the remainder of the book relates to the second. The first vision relates to the seven Churches in Asia-minor, the second to the path of God's people through the coming time (4-20), before "the New Jerusalem" comes (21-22).

We also note that chapters 6-16 describe four 'episodes', the first being seven seals depicting tyranny; the second being seven trumpets depicting chaos; the third being seven signs depicting persecution of Christians, and the fourth being seven plagues depicting destruction. It is tempting and often assumed that these episodes should be viewed as occurring one after another as they appear in the text - first tyranny, then chaos, then persecution and then destruction. However, it seems more likely that these episodes are simply the result of John focusing on four different facets of the one time period, and should be understood to be occurring simultaneously.

Therefore, we can see that the layout of the text appears to deal with time in the following way:

Symbols and meanings  (top)

(Most of this taken from Paul Barnett's Apocalypse Now and Then: Reading Revelation Today, Appendix.)

     The Message of Revelation  (top)

Utilising the basic knowledge of layout and symbolism as above, the message of Revelation can become clear, applicable and helpful. I especially noted the continuous presence of the gospel in Revelation, as well as its dealing with the issues of Christ's triumph, sin and the devil; and the book's overall encouragement for the Christian to persevere in his or her faith.

The gospel in Revelation  (top)

First, we may see that the gospel is a constant theme throughout the book: Christ, the Son of God (2:18), the "lamb who was slain" (5:6), purchased men for God with his blood (5:9), has received authority to rule (12:10), and will come again in judgement at the end of the world (22:7,12).

Issues of Christ's triumph, sin and the devil  (top)

We can also see clearly that while Christ has secured a permanent victory (5:5,9), Satan has been hurled to the earth to tempt mankind in his limited time left (12:1-13:1) yet is also in a sense chained and kept under lock and key (20:1-2). But Christ will come again (22:7,12) and the New Jerusalem will come upon earth, where there will be no suffering or pain, no sin, and where God will live with His people (21:1-5).

Encouragement to persevere  (top)

Understanding the victory won by Christ (5:5,9) and the "chained" and temporary power of Satan (20:1-2), as well as the views John gives us of the "souls of those who died for Christ" in heaven already (6:9 & 20:4), the "great multitude" of those who are in Christ in heaven (7:9-10) and the comforting and amazing view of heaven in (21:1-5), can only be an encouragement for the Christian to persevere in his or her faith. While Satan can tempt us, Christ has won - those "in Him" will go to live with Him forever and Satan will receive eternal justice (20:10).

     Further Reading  (top)

For further reading on the subject of Revelation, I recommend Leon Morris' commentary on Revelation in the Tyndale Commentary series, and Paul Barnett's excellent study guide, "Apocalypse Now and Then: Reading Revelation Today".


1way2God.net - This page last updated 13 January 2005. Copyright © 1way2God.net 2002-2004. Site Design by Design@kins